Comments on: Who Should Win? - Frank Pillers Votes

By: adam

adam — Tue, 23 Oct 2007 18:37:13 +0000

Yep Franks in the jury. Tomorrow hopefully we’ll reveal ISO50’s then Branded’s etc each day. We’ve also done surveys internally and with our shop-partners so there are lots of opinions to take into account.

By: calva

calva — Tue, 23 Oct 2007 18:26:23 +0000

Ah, the best three prices?? I misunderstood the text from Frank Piller…

Adam, is Frank in the Jury? If yes it would be not a big surprise for the winners at saturday…

By: azzaoui

azzaoui — Tue, 23 Oct 2007 17:58:42 +0000

:) oops sorry dr Frank Piller … plates excuses :)

By: Ina Dimova

Ina Dimova — Tue, 23 Oct 2007 17:50:05 +0000

@grafismo Its not good for a logo to be too literal…I see some abstract approaches in your logos too and I like them:)

By: ikou

ikou — Tue, 23 Oct 2007 17:34:16 +0000

oops sorry, it wasn’t clear for me i think that was innovation shorlist

By: adam

adam — Tue, 23 Oct 2007 17:22:20 +0000

Yeah this is his picks for 1st,2nd and 3rd place. Innovation award we’re discussing separately and I’ll hopefully reveal the winner tomorrow or Thursday.

By: jeffersonb

jeffersonb — Tue, 23 Oct 2007 17:08:02 +0000

Ohhh. No wonder it was so surprising. In that case then, yeah I probably agree about labelheads and think spreadshirt being in the top 3.

By: grafismo

grafismo — Tue, 23 Oct 2007 17:07:57 +0000

Nearby 100% desagree with expert Dr Pillers appreciations. “Pop your collar” has not a positive nor negative message. It’s up to you. It’s an asthray, UFO o pet’s recipient or collar? Dunno. Dr Pillers recognizes not really Spreadshirt specific so I don’t understand why is finalist. “Labelheads” miss up its main “concept” e.g. reproduced at critic small sizes: are faces, labels, pens, manga icons with moustaches…? What’s about colour and plot limitations? And finally, “Think Spreadshirt” imho also needs lot of work ahead; checking it out with some friends they do not recognize the icon as a “bubble, label or shirt icon” at first view You need to “explain” what’s really represents, so that’s should be a “negative point”. It shouldn´t speak by itself? Good luck anyway to 3 finalists.

By: azzaoui

azzaoui — Tue, 23 Oct 2007 17:06:44 +0000

i disagree for the same reason

- business is not a good criteria here

- we are talking creativity ideas and innovation so i don’t think these logos are strong enough for these concept.

- i mean we are talking for innovative logos or preaparing the final choice for winners i thought it was different prcess in my mind no one is specially innovative n this selection but it coulld be a good selection for finding the new logo for spreadshirt that is why they have been choosen :).

innovative ???

why don’t you ask to designers or computer arts :)

i don’ agree with this selection .

By: legofish

legofish — Tue, 23 Oct 2007 17:06:37 +0000

I might be wrong, but from my understanding of Adam’s post Frank is giving his picks for the overall OLP competition, not for his “innovation” panel prize. That explain why he is only picking from the finalists. He will probably announce his innovation prize winner separately. Maybe adam could clarify.