<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.2.2" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Week 2, Day 2, all the 2&#8217;s, two little ducks, 22.</title>
	<link>http://olp.spreadshirt.net/wordpress/2007/09/05/week-2-day-2-all-the-2s-two-little-ducks-22/</link>
	<description>Spreadshirts Open Logo Project 1.6 - Logotastic fun.</description>
	<pubDate>Tue, 24 Nov 2009 11:22:53 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.2.2</generator>

	<item>
		<title>By: Mootsie</title>
		<link>http://olp.spreadshirt.net/wordpress/2007/09/05/week-2-day-2-all-the-2s-two-little-ducks-22/#comment-30270</link>
		<author>Mootsie</author>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Sep 2007 18:52:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://olp.spreadshirt.net/wordpress/2007/09/05/week-2-day-2-all-the-2s-two-little-ducks-22/#comment-30270</guid>
		<description>I have to make another post as I found my absolute favouite one (except my last one, obviously :) )

Pen-shirt by Theoze is the kind of logo that makes you think, without any doubt "this just works!"
http://olp.spreadshirt.net/entries/2007/09/05/pen-shirt/#comments

I know it is not really smart, publicizing someonelse's entry, but what can I say? That Wacom Cintiq 21UX is really good too!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have to make another post as I found my absolute favouite one (except my last one, obviously :) )</p>
<p>Pen-shirt by Theoze is the kind of logo that makes you think, without any doubt &#8220;this just works!&#8221;<br />
<a href="http://olp.spreadshirt.net/entries/2007/09/05/pen-shirt/#comments" rel="nofollow">http://olp.spreadshirt.net/entries/2007/09/05/pen-shirt/#comments</a></p>
<p>I know it is not really smart, publicizing someonelse&#8217;s entry, but what can I say? That Wacom Cintiq 21UX is really good too!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: oliver</title>
		<link>http://olp.spreadshirt.net/wordpress/2007/09/05/week-2-day-2-all-the-2s-two-little-ducks-22/#comment-30269</link>
		<author>oliver</author>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Sep 2007 16:40:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://olp.spreadshirt.net/wordpress/2007/09/05/week-2-day-2-all-the-2s-two-little-ducks-22/#comment-30269</guid>
		<description>any suggestions for the visual spreading logo?  I didn't really hear any criticisms.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>any suggestions for the visual spreading logo?  I didn&#8217;t really hear any criticisms.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Further Insight and Briefing at The Open Logo Project 1.6</title>
		<link>http://olp.spreadshirt.net/wordpress/2007/09/05/week-2-day-2-all-the-2s-two-little-ducks-22/#comment-30268</link>
		<author>Further Insight and Briefing at The Open Logo Project 1.6</author>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Sep 2007 16:39:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://olp.spreadshirt.net/wordpress/2007/09/05/week-2-day-2-all-the-2s-two-little-ducks-22/#comment-30268</guid>
		<description>[...] up everywhere, about the sort of logo we should be looking for, if you haven&#8217;t read them yet take a look and add your 2 cents. We know that the more of a briefing we can give you, the easier [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] up everywhere, about the sort of logo we should be looking for, if you haven&#8217;t read them yet take a look and add your 2 cents. We know that the more of a briefing we can give you, the easier [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: adam</title>
		<link>http://olp.spreadshirt.net/wordpress/2007/09/05/week-2-day-2-all-the-2s-two-little-ducks-22/#comment-30265</link>
		<author>adam</author>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Sep 2007 14:46:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://olp.spreadshirt.net/wordpress/2007/09/05/week-2-day-2-all-the-2s-two-little-ducks-22/#comment-30265</guid>
		<description>Hey logodesigner, yep got it but it must have got buried. I'll sort it out now ;)

updated: now done, sorry for delay...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey logodesigner, yep got it but it must have got buried. I&#8217;ll sort it out now ;)</p>
<p>updated: now done, sorry for delay&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: captain paranoid</title>
		<link>http://olp.spreadshirt.net/wordpress/2007/09/05/week-2-day-2-all-the-2s-two-little-ducks-22/#comment-30264</link>
		<author>captain paranoid</author>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Sep 2007 14:42:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://olp.spreadshirt.net/wordpress/2007/09/05/week-2-day-2-all-the-2s-two-little-ducks-22/#comment-30264</guid>
		<description>1. "great design are always subjective" =  well somehow. but there are rules which differs a great design from the wanna bees. and i see way too many wanna bees, which are hyped without any reason. 

2. i found no design which really made me scream. so i can't post one, but there are some which have potentials. like some of them mootsie posted and some where i commented on.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>1. &#8220;great design are always subjective&#8221; =  well somehow. but there are rules which differs a great design from the wanna bees. and i see way too many wanna bees, which are hyped without any reason. </p>
<p>2. i found no design which really made me scream. so i can&#8217;t post one, but there are some which have potentials. like some of them mootsie posted and some where i commented on.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: logodesigner</title>
		<link>http://olp.spreadshirt.net/wordpress/2007/09/05/week-2-day-2-all-the-2s-two-little-ducks-22/#comment-30263</link>
		<author>logodesigner</author>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Sep 2007 14:32:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://olp.spreadshirt.net/wordpress/2007/09/05/week-2-day-2-all-the-2s-two-little-ducks-22/#comment-30263</guid>
		<description>Adam - sort of off topic but i had sent you a replacement .gif by email for the "additional variations" image that is on my above entry page because the current one looks distorted and blurry.But so far no response and nor replacement :(.I think i sent it to the olp[at]spreadshirt[dot]net address.

Would be great if you could check if you've received it and if so, replace the current one.

Thanks !

Frank</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Adam - sort of off topic but i had sent you a replacement .gif by email for the &#8220;additional variations&#8221; image that is on my above entry page because the current one looks distorted and blurry.But so far no response and nor replacement :(.I think i sent it to the olp[at]spreadshirt[dot]net address.</p>
<p>Would be great if you could check if you&#8217;ve received it and if so, replace the current one.</p>
<p>Thanks !</p>
<p>Frank</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mootsie</title>
		<link>http://olp.spreadshirt.net/wordpress/2007/09/05/week-2-day-2-all-the-2s-two-little-ducks-22/#comment-30260</link>
		<author>Mootsie</author>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Sep 2007 13:29:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://olp.spreadshirt.net/wordpress/2007/09/05/week-2-day-2-all-the-2s-two-little-ducks-22/#comment-30260</guid>
		<description>I posted a list of my favourites of the week with explanations, but it is currently "awaiting moderation" (maybe bacause there are links in it? ore because it is too long?)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I posted a list of my favourites of the week with explanations, but it is currently &#8220;awaiting moderation&#8221; (maybe bacause there are links in it? ore because it is too long?)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: adam</title>
		<link>http://olp.spreadshirt.net/wordpress/2007/09/05/week-2-day-2-all-the-2s-two-little-ducks-22/#comment-30259</link>
		<author>adam</author>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Sep 2007 13:27:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://olp.spreadshirt.net/wordpress/2007/09/05/week-2-day-2-all-the-2s-two-little-ducks-22/#comment-30259</guid>
		<description>"Talking points" - great design are always subjective. Instead I'm trying to show some interesting approaches if you don't like them captain paranoid stop bashing and leave a comment with ones that you do like ;)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Talking points&#8221; - great design are always subjective. Instead I&#8217;m trying to show some interesting approaches if you don&#8217;t like them captain paranoid stop bashing and leave a comment with ones that you do like ;)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mootsie</title>
		<link>http://olp.spreadshirt.net/wordpress/2007/09/05/week-2-day-2-all-the-2s-two-little-ducks-22/#comment-30258</link>
		<author>Mootsie</author>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Sep 2007 13:19:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://olp.spreadshirt.net/wordpress/2007/09/05/week-2-day-2-all-the-2s-two-little-ducks-22/#comment-30258</guid>
		<description>Well, talking about it, I'll just point out the ones I liked most:

-
Very simple indeed but so fresh it stands out in its own way: Label Shirt by kreadid (maybe the two little "s" in the label should be deleted as they are too tiny)
http://olp.spreadshirt.net/entries/2007/09/04/label-shirt/#comments
-
Another easy but catchy one, I think that Spreadshirt TM by Family! would work well in quite any colour, would be perfect for a low-budget-nice-looking-sticker (this could always come out useful ) and can easily fit in quite any contest (and with a very little adjustment, it could also look like a label...)
http://olp.spreadshirt.net/entries/2007/09/04/spreadshirt-tm-by-family/

-
Heartshapedbox #1 is an eye-candy logo, very nice, funny, bold and distinctive. Maybe the little bird has nothing to share with the company's purposes, but it's nice by the way :) (and now that I think about it, this is one of those cases in which you can't use the logo without necessarily put also the claim...and this could be a wak point)
http://olp.spreadshirt.net/entries/2007/09/04/heartshapedbox-1/

-
At last  a logo that maybe would not work very well as a logo for some technical and perceptive reasons, but I found the idea so cute that I had to point it out: Your own face by simona (and it reminds me of some illustrated books I had when I was a child!)
http://olp.spreadshirt.net/entries/2007/09/03/your-own-face/#comments

So this is it. I don't want to say that those logos should get into the shortlist of week2, but I found that my previous post was complaining wihout bringing anything to the discussion, and I don't like doing such things...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well, talking about it, I&#8217;ll just point out the ones I liked most:</p>
<p>-<br />
Very simple indeed but so fresh it stands out in its own way: Label Shirt by kreadid (maybe the two little &#8220;s&#8221; in the label should be deleted as they are too tiny)<br />
<a href="http://olp.spreadshirt.net/entries/2007/09/04/label-shirt/#comments" rel="nofollow">http://olp.spreadshirt.net/entries/2007/09/04/label-shirt/#comments</a><br />
-<br />
Another easy but catchy one, I think that Spreadshirt TM by Family! would work well in quite any colour, would be perfect for a low-budget-nice-looking-sticker (this could always come out useful ) and can easily fit in quite any contest (and with a very little adjustment, it could also look like a label&#8230;)<br />
<a href="http://olp.spreadshirt.net/entries/2007/09/04/spreadshirt-tm-by-family/" rel="nofollow">http://olp.spreadshirt.net/entries/2007/09/04/spreadshirt-tm-by-family/</a></p>
<p>-<br />
Heartshapedbox #1 is an eye-candy logo, very nice, funny, bold and distinctive. Maybe the little bird has nothing to share with the company&#8217;s purposes, but it&#8217;s nice by the way :) (and now that I think about it, this is one of those cases in which you can&#8217;t use the logo without necessarily put also the claim&#8230;and this could be a wak point)<br />
<a href="http://olp.spreadshirt.net/entries/2007/09/04/heartshapedbox-1/" rel="nofollow">http://olp.spreadshirt.net/entries/2007/09/04/heartshapedbox-1/</a></p>
<p>-<br />
At last  a logo that maybe would not work very well as a logo for some technical and perceptive reasons, but I found the idea so cute that I had to point it out: Your own face by simona (and it reminds me of some illustrated books I had when I was a child!)<br />
<a href="http://olp.spreadshirt.net/entries/2007/09/03/your-own-face/#comments" rel="nofollow">http://olp.spreadshirt.net/entries/2007/09/03/your-own-face/#comments</a></p>
<p>So this is it. I don&#8217;t want to say that those logos should get into the shortlist of week2, but I found that my previous post was complaining wihout bringing anything to the discussion, and I don&#8217;t like doing such things&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ami</title>
		<link>http://olp.spreadshirt.net/wordpress/2007/09/05/week-2-day-2-all-the-2s-two-little-ducks-22/#comment-30257</link>
		<author>ami</author>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Sep 2007 13:19:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://olp.spreadshirt.net/wordpress/2007/09/05/week-2-day-2-all-the-2s-two-little-ducks-22/#comment-30257</guid>
		<description>well, I could imagine the author of this blogpost wanted to initiate a discussion about our yesterday's favourites ;)
the typo-drafts are .. interesting, but I also think not really the way to go (which is okay since we should keep in mind the fun factor).

As for the submissions above I like the shadow draft altough it's very hard to execute and use. And I'm still with the "created by" submission, but not 100% from the presented way .. but rather from the idea and the potential behind - spreadshirt as a frame for others people business. so instead of coining the logo all by ourself, maybe bringing up a frame as a logo is interesting to me .. if it leaves the partner the chance to fill it on his own, ie with his own logo or name or brand (but a lot of conceptual effort and hand-work I guess).

from the simplicity my favourite still is the &lt;a href="http://olp.spreadshirt.net/entries/2007/09/04/spreadshirt-tm-by-family/" rel="nofollow"&gt;draft from family&lt;/a&gt;. Now please tell me that there were some circles before in the history of design ;) so I can tell you that the concept and what you can use a logo for in context is more important to me (as a marketer) than desperately chasing for the most abstract most totally awesome unique (simple!) symbol. like someone said in the nike-swoosh post, it's about what you make out of a logo, not what it is ...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>well, I could imagine the author of this blogpost wanted to initiate a discussion about our yesterday&#8217;s favourites ;)<br />
the typo-drafts are .. interesting, but I also think not really the way to go (which is okay since we should keep in mind the fun factor).</p>
<p>As for the submissions above I like the shadow draft altough it&#8217;s very hard to execute and use. And I&#8217;m still with the &#8220;created by&#8221; submission, but not 100% from the presented way .. but rather from the idea and the potential behind - spreadshirt as a frame for others people business. so instead of coining the logo all by ourself, maybe bringing up a frame as a logo is interesting to me .. if it leaves the partner the chance to fill it on his own, ie with his own logo or name or brand (but a lot of conceptual effort and hand-work I guess).</p>
<p>from the simplicity my favourite still is the <a href="http://olp.spreadshirt.net/entries/2007/09/04/spreadshirt-tm-by-family/" rel="nofollow">draft from family</a>. Now please tell me that there were some circles before in the history of design ;) so I can tell you that the concept and what you can use a logo for in context is more important to me (as a marketer) than desperately chasing for the most abstract most totally awesome unique (simple!) symbol. like someone said in the nike-swoosh post, it&#8217;s about what you make out of a logo, not what it is &#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
