Comments on: spreadshirt tm version2

By: schimanski

schimanski — Sat, 13 Oct 2007 15:45:13 +0000

btw. did not say that this is a bad logo. just said that it don’t fit the new vision of “personal branding”

By: schimanski

schimanski — Sat, 13 Oct 2007 15:43:27 +0000

@calva: don’t worrie. i do. i just don’t want to kiss everybodies ass like most the others do here. discussion is not only one side. there should be both. and what i said is honestly what i believe. only because it can stand alone doesen’t makes it a good logo.

By: Calva

Calva — Sat, 13 Oct 2007 14:56:24 +0000

@schimanski: i think, this logo is ideal, because it can stand alone without “spreadshirt”, it’s impressful and holds a long time. And you should choose your words advisedly, here and at other logos…

By: klos

klos — Sat, 13 Oct 2007 14:40:28 +0000

Nice logo but there is nothing new.

By: schimanski

schimanski — Sat, 13 Oct 2007 09:02:50 +0000

DON’T BELIEVE THE HYPE. i don’t see this to represent the new positioning of “personal branding”.
no focus on individuality, no playfullness, nothing the user can play around with. one static logo replaces the other (the fingerprint), which for me in this case is stronger and represents more then this. there are some things i don’t get. if your name is spreadshirt, why to have an shirticon. it’s ridicolous. then the bubble. it’s ok i can live with that, but its not unique. bubble is the latest hype. what happens in one/ two years when the hype is over and people are bored by bubbles. ah damn i forget, olp3 is waiting. sorry.

By: Joel

Joel — Fri, 12 Oct 2007 12:41:05 +0000

Congrats! Maybe its only me that sees strange things in there. After a while when this logo will be around already we will surely take it as spreadshirt and nothing else. good work!

By: SJP

SJP — Fri, 12 Oct 2007 09:06:59 +0000

I like it - and it instantly looks familiar, which is a good thing

By: marcson

marcson — Fri, 12 Oct 2007 06:45:59 +0000

Like it, simple, but it is so recognizable and effective!!

By: azzaoui

azzaoui — Thu, 11 Oct 2007 20:12:11 +0000

agree with clem …

nice version

By: Clem

Clem — Thu, 11 Oct 2007 19:29:37 +0000

I like it! Very simple
Damage that you don’t give some concrets exemples (web, print…)
to follow…

By: Joel

Joel — Thu, 11 Oct 2007 19:25:31 +0000

I also saw something like pi or thought it may appear as a chinese letter. But it still looks nice!

By: Jebs

Jebs — Thu, 11 Oct 2007 19:20:10 +0000

il like it japasa…but you know what i see often, looking at it? the “Pi” 3.14 etc…number, and then, when it occurs, that bothers me a little bit…perhaps my imagination is playing with me

By: Japasa

Japasa — Thu, 11 Oct 2007 19:14:36 +0000

thank you for your feedback! I am glad that a lot of people like that.
I think it would be very flexible to change the colours which spreadshirt really like. at the moment it is very important for spreadshirt to see this shape and typo at first I think.

I will try to find different possibilites for the arrangement and ideal colour for spreadshirt. I will present spreadshirt different solutions soon

By: ami

ami — Thu, 11 Oct 2007 18:34:57 +0000

nice versions. two little thing that came up in the feedback loop: the white on green version reminds some people of microsoft / windows. I’m sure this is because of the coloring and the gradient background color.
2nd - it would be cool to have a stacked version (or at least a version with spread/shirt split up more visibly). but still a lot of people love this logo.