spreadshirt tm version2

14 Responses to “spreadshirt tm version2”

1. 1 by ami | Oct 11th, 2007 at 8:34 pm

   nice versions. two little thing that came up in the feedback loop: the white on green version reminds some people of microsoft / windows. I’m sure this is because of the coloring and the gradient background color.
   2nd - it would be cool to have a stacked version (or at least a version with spread/shirt split up more visibly). but still a lot of people love this logo.

2. 2 by Japasa | Oct 11th, 2007 at 9:14 pm

   thank you for your feedback! I am glad that a lot of people like that.
   I think it would be very flexible to change the colours which spreadshirt really like. at the moment it is very important for spreadshirt to see this shape and typo at first I think.

   I will try to find different possibilites for the arrangement and ideal colour for spreadshirt. I will present spreadshirt different solutions soon

3. 3 by Jebs | Oct 11th, 2007 at 9:20 pm

   il like it japasa…but you know what i see often, looking at it? the “Pi” 3.14 etc…number, and then, when it occurs, that bothers me a little bit…perhaps my imagination is playing with me

4. 4 by Joel | Oct 11th, 2007 at 9:25 pm

   I also saw something like pi or thought it may appear as a chinese letter. But it still looks nice!

5. 5 by Clem | Oct 11th, 2007 at 9:29 pm

   I like it! Very simple
   Damage that you don’t give some concrets exemples (web, print…)
   to follow…

6. 6 by azzaoui | Oct 11th, 2007 at 10:12 pm

   agree with clem …

   nice version

7. 7 by marcson | Oct 12th, 2007 at 8:45 am

   Like it, simple, but it is so recognizable and effective!!

8. 8 by SJP | Oct 12th, 2007 at 11:06 am

   I like it - and it instantly looks familiar, which is a good thing

9. 9 by Joel | Oct 12th, 2007 at 2:41 pm

   Congrats! Maybe its only me that sees strange things in there. After a while when this logo will be around already we will surely take it as spreadshirt and nothing else. good work!

10. 10 by schimanski | Oct 13th, 2007 at 11:02 am

    DON’T BELIEVE THE HYPE. i don’t see this to represent the new positioning of “personal branding”.
    no focus on individuality, no playfullness, nothing the user can play around with. one static logo replaces the other (the fingerprint), which for me in this case is stronger and represents more then this. there are some things i don’t get. if your name is spreadshirt, why to have an shirticon. it’s ridicolous. then the bubble. it’s ok i can live with that, but its not unique. bubble is the latest hype. what happens in one/ two years when the hype is over and people are bored by bubbles. ah damn i forget, olp3 is waiting. sorry.

11. 11 by klos | Oct 13th, 2007 at 4:40 pm

    Nice logo but there is nothing new.

12. 12 by Calva | Oct 13th, 2007 at 4:56 pm

    @schimanski: i think, this logo is ideal, because it can stand alone without “spreadshirt”, it’s impressful and holds a long time. And you should choose your words advisedly, here and at other logos…

13. 13 by schimanski | Oct 13th, 2007 at 5:43 pm

    @calva: don’t worrie. i do. i just don’t want to kiss everybodies ass like most the others do here. discussion is not only one side. there should be both. and what i said is honestly what i believe. only because it can stand alone doesen’t makes it a good logo.

14. 14 by schimanski | Oct 13th, 2007 at 5:45 pm

    btw. did not say that this is a bad logo. just said that it don’t fit the new vision of “personal branding”

Leave a Reply