<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.2.2" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Created By</title>
	<link>http://olp.spreadshirt.net/entries/2007/09/02/855/</link>
	<description>Spreadshirts Open Logo Project 1.6 - Here are the entries...</description>
	<pubDate>Tue, 24 Nov 2009 12:10:28 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.2.2</generator>

	<item>
		<title>By: Max</title>
		<link>http://olp.spreadshirt.net/entries/2007/09/02/855/#comment-465</link>
		<author>Max</author>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 Sep 2007 12:25:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://olp.spreadshirt.net/entries/2007/09/02/855/#comment-465</guid>
		<description>i forgot...

4. "created by"
overrated
a question: is spreadshirt a label? or is it more a sub-label?
i think, that spreadshirt is more a sub-label, the main-label are made by each shirt-designer. for example if i create a shirt-shop called "austrian soccer &#38; rock music collide" i need to design my own label-logo completly new with all possibilities, so finaly the "created by" is not more than a small line of text.

5. composition
I agree to the first post of jana - simplify!

now, i am out... :-)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>i forgot&#8230;</p>
<p>4. &#8220;created by&#8221;<br />
overrated<br />
a question: is spreadshirt a label? or is it more a sub-label?<br />
i think, that spreadshirt is more a sub-label, the main-label are made by each shirt-designer. for example if i create a shirt-shop called &#8220;austrian soccer &amp; rock music collide&#8221; i need to design my own label-logo completly new with all possibilities, so finaly the &#8220;created by&#8221; is not more than a small line of text.</p>
<p>5. composition<br />
I agree to the first post of jana - simplify!</p>
<p>now, i am out&#8230; <img src='http://olp.spreadshirt.net/entries/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':-)' class='wp-smiley' /></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Max</title>
		<link>http://olp.spreadshirt.net/entries/2007/09/02/855/#comment-456</link>
		<author>Max</author>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 Sep 2007 11:44:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://olp.spreadshirt.net/entries/2007/09/02/855/#comment-456</guid>
		<description>1. Fingerprint Symbol
Perfekt.
I like the Fingerprint, more, i am a fan, you should keep it!!!
It is a very strong, symbol for customized work, without loosing impact in longtime usage...

2. Typo
Ok. 
Very simple, i think it will do a good job, but also a little bit boring, specialy both colors and those dividing style beetween "spread" and "shirt" - this isn´t realy unique and not fresh.  i feel like i have it seen 1000times before. Give give them a little bit more colorful tones, i think this doesn´t destroy the typos readability. If you keep it like this, you have to redesign it sooner or later...

3. Shirt Symbol
Essential.
It follows your briefing, the material of the product. 
The position behind the word "shirt" is a needless double effect. If you can read it, you don´t need to see as a symbol again and otherwise if you see the shirt you don´t have to read the word "shirt" on it - if you are more than 6 years old. My suggestion: put the shirt behind the fingerprint,  the result is a easy-understanding combination of the material product and the mental part, a combination of spreadshirt and there designers in one symbol. this will work with and without typo....

a lot of know-it-all critics, it could be much easier for me to work together with the designer in front of the screen,  but if you agree in some points, this can help hopefully....overall this is the best finalist so far...thumbs up!!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>1. Fingerprint Symbol<br />
Perfekt.<br />
I like the Fingerprint, more, i am a fan, you should keep it!!!<br />
It is a very strong, symbol for customized work, without loosing impact in longtime usage&#8230;</p>
<p>2. Typo<br />
Ok.<br />
Very simple, i think it will do a good job, but also a little bit boring, specialy both colors and those dividing style beetween &#8220;spread&#8221; and &#8220;shirt&#8221; - this isn´t realy unique and not fresh.  i feel like i have it seen 1000times before. Give give them a little bit more colorful tones, i think this doesn´t destroy the typos readability. If you keep it like this, you have to redesign it sooner or later&#8230;</p>
<p>3. Shirt Symbol<br />
Essential.<br />
It follows your briefing, the material of the product.<br />
The position behind the word &#8220;shirt&#8221; is a needless double effect. If you can read it, you don´t need to see as a symbol again and otherwise if you see the shirt you don´t have to read the word &#8220;shirt&#8221; on it - if you are more than 6 years old. My suggestion: put the shirt behind the fingerprint,  the result is a easy-understanding combination of the material product and the mental part, a combination of spreadshirt and there designers in one symbol. this will work with and without typo&#8230;.</p>
<p>a lot of know-it-all critics, it could be much easier for me to work together with the designer in front of the screen,  but if you agree in some points, this can help hopefully&#8230;.overall this is the best finalist so far&#8230;thumbs up!!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Pascalphilly</title>
		<link>http://olp.spreadshirt.net/entries/2007/09/02/855/#comment-422</link>
		<author>Pascalphilly</author>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Sep 2007 23:19:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://olp.spreadshirt.net/entries/2007/09/02/855/#comment-422</guid>
		<description>Though I like the personalization idea, there is just too much going on in this one. I do not know where to look at first and it seems all possible elements where just thrown in one logo. A logo should be fast working and precise.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Though I like the personalization idea, there is just too much going on in this one. I do not know where to look at first and it seems all possible elements where just thrown in one logo. A logo should be fast working and precise.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Yael</title>
		<link>http://olp.spreadshirt.net/entries/2007/09/02/855/#comment-401</link>
		<author>Yael</author>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Sep 2007 14:36:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://olp.spreadshirt.net/entries/2007/09/02/855/#comment-401</guid>
		<description>Conceptually good, execution-wise, not so refined. Needs refinement. But definitely fulfills the 'explain what we do' requirement very well.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Conceptually good, execution-wise, not so refined. Needs refinement. But definitely fulfills the &#8216;explain what we do&#8217; requirement very well.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: adam</title>
		<link>http://olp.spreadshirt.net/entries/2007/09/02/855/#comment-397</link>
		<author>adam</author>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Sep 2007 12:27:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://olp.spreadshirt.net/entries/2007/09/02/855/#comment-397</guid>
		<description>Very nice design. The customization idea is very cool, let the partner/customer pick their own middle part, have the fingerprint or a shirt or something for when we as a company use it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Very nice design. The customization idea is very cool, let the partner/customer pick their own middle part, have the fingerprint or a shirt or something for when we as a company use it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ami</title>
		<link>http://olp.spreadshirt.net/entries/2007/09/02/855/#comment-387</link>
		<author>ami</author>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Sep 2007 10:12:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://olp.spreadshirt.net/entries/2007/09/02/855/#comment-387</guid>
		<description>I like the "owned by" idea - it could be an additional way to point out who is the owner of the label. but I also though maybe we can use the "main area" (in which the fingeprint is) as a field which can be customized by the partner ..</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I like the &#8220;owned by&#8221; idea - it could be an additional way to point out who is the owner of the label. but I also though maybe we can use the &#8220;main area&#8221; (in which the fingeprint is) as a field which can be customized by the partner ..</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jana Eggers</title>
		<link>http://olp.spreadshirt.net/entries/2007/09/02/855/#comment-381</link>
		<author>Jana Eggers</author>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Sep 2007 09:00:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://olp.spreadshirt.net/entries/2007/09/02/855/#comment-381</guid>
		<description>What I like about this one is that it gets across the label point.

I think the tagline is lost here though. And this would be a hard one to plot print... though not impossible, I believe.

Maybe some simplification could help.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What I like about this one is that it gets across the label point.</p>
<p>I think the tagline is lost here though. And this would be a hard one to plot print&#8230; though not impossible, I believe.</p>
<p>Maybe some simplification could help.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
