<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.2.2" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Blue tag</title>
	<link>http://olp.spreadshirt.net/entries/2007/08/31/blue-tag/</link>
	<description>Spreadshirts Open Logo Project 1.6 - Here are the entries...</description>
	<pubDate>Tue, 24 Nov 2009 14:54:26 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.2.2</generator>

	<item>
		<title>By: Mork</title>
		<link>http://olp.spreadshirt.net/entries/2007/08/31/blue-tag/#comment-1378</link>
		<author>Mork</author>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Sep 2007 14:49:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://olp.spreadshirt.net/entries/2007/08/31/blue-tag/#comment-1378</guid>
		<description>best entry by far</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>best entry by far</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: bulgrin</title>
		<link>http://olp.spreadshirt.net/entries/2007/08/31/blue-tag/#comment-524</link>
		<author>bulgrin</author>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Sep 2007 08:06:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://olp.spreadshirt.net/entries/2007/08/31/blue-tag/#comment-524</guid>
		<description>Agreeing with Jana Eggers, stacked is better and with adjusted claim. No more colors needed, prefer the orange version.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Agreeing with Jana Eggers, stacked is better and with adjusted claim. No more colors needed, prefer the orange version.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: inuit</title>
		<link>http://olp.spreadshirt.net/entries/2007/08/31/blue-tag/#comment-502</link>
		<author>inuit</author>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 Sep 2007 19:30:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://olp.spreadshirt.net/entries/2007/08/31/blue-tag/#comment-502</guid>
		<description>I understand what you mean. 
But again, it's &lt;i&gt;symbolic&lt;/i&gt;. The old spreadshirt logo had a fingerprint in it, that was symbolic, too. It didn't mean that Spreadshirt was a crime lab. 

The tag here represents the idea of having your own label/brand. There is no explicit visual code for a brand, that's why one has to use symbolic approach. This is not a revolutionary idea, in fact I think most of the logos are symbolic rather than literal.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I understand what you mean.<br />
But again, it&#8217;s <i>symbolic</i>. The old spreadshirt logo had a fingerprint in it, that was symbolic, too. It didn&#8217;t mean that Spreadshirt was a crime lab. </p>
<p>The tag here represents the idea of having your own label/brand. There is no explicit visual code for a brand, that&#8217;s why one has to use symbolic approach. This is not a revolutionary idea, in fact I think most of the logos are symbolic rather than literal.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Pascalphilly</title>
		<link>http://olp.spreadshirt.net/entries/2007/08/31/blue-tag/#comment-497</link>
		<author>Pascalphilly</author>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 Sep 2007 17:57:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://olp.spreadshirt.net/entries/2007/08/31/blue-tag/#comment-497</guid>
		<description>I am sorry that I only pointed this out in your logo, its the same with the others. Dont you understand what I mean? Is the tagline not supposed to mean "its your own brand" but showing a label is telling you "its your own tag"?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am sorry that I only pointed this out in your logo, its the same with the others. Dont you understand what I mean? Is the tagline not supposed to mean &#8220;its your own brand&#8221; but showing a label is telling you &#8220;its your own tag&#8221;?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: inuit</title>
		<link>http://olp.spreadshirt.net/entries/2007/08/31/blue-tag/#comment-445</link>
		<author>inuit</author>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 Sep 2007 09:25:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://olp.spreadshirt.net/entries/2007/08/31/blue-tag/#comment-445</guid>
		<description>I don't see the confusion here. Clearly the tag is a symbolic representation of label (which I suspect is the case in the four other logo designs here that use tag in some form).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t see the confusion here. Clearly the tag is a symbolic representation of label (which I suspect is the case in the four other logo designs here that use tag in some form).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Pascalphilly</title>
		<link>http://olp.spreadshirt.net/entries/2007/08/31/blue-tag/#comment-417</link>
		<author>Pascalphilly</author>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Sep 2007 23:08:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://olp.spreadshirt.net/entries/2007/08/31/blue-tag/#comment-417</guid>
		<description>To me it looks like a sewing company. In my opinion it is a confusing of the word label meaning tag and label meaning brand (which should be the case for this company if I get it right).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>To me it looks like a sewing company. In my opinion it is a confusing of the word label meaning tag and label meaning brand (which should be the case for this company if I get it right).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: inuit</title>
		<link>http://olp.spreadshirt.net/entries/2007/08/31/blue-tag/#comment-398</link>
		<author>inuit</author>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Sep 2007 12:38:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://olp.spreadshirt.net/entries/2007/08/31/blue-tag/#comment-398</guid>
		<description>Thank you both for your comments!

credonaut: Ha, I can see what you mean, when there's a lot of them together it kind of looks like a bunch of sperm cells... The thread is easy to modify though. Anyway, nothing wrong with sperm cells...? There's a new business being born when the designer and spreadshirt come together (better leave it at that, haha).

Jana Eggers: I was thinking about justifying the text with the square, but it didn't work quite as well. It looked a bit unstable, like it's about to collapse (now it's more like it has a base where the logo rests). Also, I think it looks more interesting that way, it kind of separates the logo and the slogan a bit, instead of it being a big "lump".
Also, I like to keep things simple (colourwise and other). I think it looks cool, plus that way things won't look dated in a year or two!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thank you both for your comments!</p>
<p>credonaut: Ha, I can see what you mean, when there&#8217;s a lot of them together it kind of looks like a bunch of sperm cells&#8230; The thread is easy to modify though. Anyway, nothing wrong with sperm cells&#8230;? There&#8217;s a new business being born when the designer and spreadshirt come together (better leave it at that, haha).</p>
<p>Jana Eggers: I was thinking about justifying the text with the square, but it didn&#8217;t work quite as well. It looked a bit unstable, like it&#8217;s about to collapse (now it&#8217;s more like it has a base where the logo rests). Also, I think it looks more interesting that way, it kind of separates the logo and the slogan a bit, instead of it being a big &#8220;lump&#8221;.<br />
Also, I like to keep things simple (colourwise and other). I think it looks cool, plus that way things won&#8217;t look dated in a year or two!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jana Eggers</title>
		<link>http://olp.spreadshirt.net/entries/2007/08/31/blue-tag/#comment-386</link>
		<author>Jana Eggers</author>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Sep 2007 09:14:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://olp.spreadshirt.net/entries/2007/08/31/blue-tag/#comment-386</guid>
		<description>I am big fan of this! I like the stacked version.

Wonder if some more color could (should?) be added? 

Also, in the stacked version should "your own label" be justified with the square?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am big fan of this! I like the stacked version.</p>
<p>Wonder if some more color could (should?) be added? </p>
<p>Also, in the stacked version should &#8220;your own label&#8221; be justified with the square?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: credonaut</title>
		<link>http://olp.spreadshirt.net/entries/2007/08/31/blue-tag/#comment-275</link>
		<author>credonaut</author>
		<pubDate>Fri, 31 Aug 2007 10:33:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://olp.spreadshirt.net/entries/2007/08/31/blue-tag/#comment-275</guid>
		<description>The stitched label, ah yes. But somehow the string reminds me rather of a ... hm, well ... male monocellular transporter of Y-chromosomes, so to speak.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The stitched label, ah yes. But somehow the string reminds me rather of a &#8230; hm, well &#8230; male monocellular transporter of Y-chromosomes, so to speak.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
